Dear Members of the Oak Lawn Committee,

On behalf of the SOHIP Zoning Committee and the roughly 6,000 residents we represent, thank you for the time, rigor, and care you have brought to the 4211 Newton Avenue case over the past ten months. We also want to acknowledge the work of our own committee members, the Case Committee, and — to be fair — the development team, who returned to the table more than once when they could have walked away.

We want to be clear about where SOHIP stands, and where we have always stood.

Our position on MF-2 has not changed. The 45-foot height limit in MF-2 zoning exists for a reason, and SOHIP's Zoning Committee remains firmly opposed to variances that exceed it. That principle is not a negotiating position. It is the foundation of the neighborhood's character, the basis on which thousands of residents bought their homes, and the standard we expect to be applied across SOHIP going forward.

What the developer did. When this project was first introduced, it stood at 28 stories. Through three rounds of revisions, multiple Case Committee sessions, neighborhood town halls attended by more than 300 residents, and direct engagement with our neighborhood, the proposal has been revised to 16 stories, with numerous improvements based on feedback. The developer has also committed to neighborhood investments, including support for our plaza parks, street sign toppers, and traffic improvement assistance.

Where the Zoning Committee has landed. After ten months of analysis, three developer proposals, extensive Case Committee dialogue, community feedback gathered through our official channels, and considerable internal deliberation, the SOHIP Zoning Committee has concluded that the current revised proposal represents the best available outcome for this site, for the existing property owners, and for SOHIP, given the realities of the process ahead and the uncertainties of any alternative path. This is not an endorsement of the variance.

What this position does not mean. This is not a blanket acceptance of MF-2 variances in SOHIP. It is not a precedent. It does not signal flexibility on future requests, on this site or any other, and it should not be cited as such.

Resident feedback. In the interest of full transparency, the SOHIP Zoning Committee gathered direct feedback from residents in two rounds — first when the project was introduced at 28 stories, and again after the developer's revision to 16 stories.

Original positions (189 responses, when the project was first introduced):

  • 148 opposed (78%)
  • 10 supported (5%)
  • 31 undecided (16%)

Revised positions (92 residents updated their position on the revised proposal):

  • 73 opposed (79%)
  • 13 supported (14%)
  • 6 undecided (7%)

We share these numbers because the Oak Lawn Committee deserves the complete picture, including the parts that are uncomfortable for us. Opposition to this project has been, and remains, substantial.

John McCarley
Chair, SOHIP Zoning Committee